Charles Spencer's book appears to be riddled with errors, at least in reference to Piers Morgan. If didn't bother to check easily verifiable facts why should we believe the rest of the book which appears to be unverifiable memory?
It would seem to me that he is doing his best to destabilise the monarchy so I wonder if he is doing this at the behest of a foreign power. I have no means of proving this theory which puts it on a par with most of his book.
No comments:
Post a Comment